Cloud application architecture
Workload design across App Service, Container Apps, and Functions with clear boundaries, scaling behaviour, and failure modes.
Azure cloud and AI
We design and build Azure workloads with a clear position on identity, integration, observability, and deployment — so the system is straightforward to run, safe to change, and honest about what it costs.
The problem
If more than one of these is familiar, they are probably connected. We look for the underlying cause before proposing a build.
Capabilities
Workload design across App Service, Container Apps, and Functions with clear boundaries, scaling behaviour, and failure modes.
Document intelligence, search, language, and model integration applied where they solve a specific business problem.
API design and management, event-driven patterns, messaging, and reliable system-to-system integration with proper error handling.
Microsoft Entra ID, managed identities, least-privilege role assignment, and secret handling through Key Vault rather than configuration files.
Azure Functions and event-driven components for background processing, scheduled work, and integration endpoints that scale to zero.
Application Insights, structured logging, health checks, dashboards, and alerts tied to the behaviour that actually matters to the business.
Delivery approach
A repeatable path from an unclear problem to a system someone owns. The lifecycle decisions happen early, where they are cheap.
Understand the workload, the integration surface, the compliance and residency constraints, and the operational reality of the team who will run it.
Produce a target architecture with named services, an identity and network position, a deployment model, and an explicit cost shape.
Implement with infrastructure as code, automated deployment, secure defaults, and instrumentation built in from the first environment.
Review performance, cost, and reliability against real telemetry, then tune the parts of the system the data points at.
Product names are used descriptively. The right combination is decided during design, not assumed at the start.
Outcomes
Infrastructure defined as code means a new environment is a deployment rather than a project.
Retries, dead-letter handling, and alerting turn silent failures into visible, actionable events.
Managed identities, least privilege, and centrally managed secrets replace shared credentials and configuration sprawl.
Service choices, scaling rules, and tagging make the monthly bill traceable to specific workloads.
Automation • Azure • AI Agents
Regulated services provider
An Azure service that classifies and extracts data from inbound documents, routes low-confidence cases to a human, and writes verified results into the business system.
View case study
Data & Power BI • Azure
Regional services group
A certified semantic model and executive reporting layer that ended the reconciliation debate, replacing conflicting spreadsheets with one agreed set of measures.
View case study
AI Agents
A practical approach to grounding, permissions, evaluation, and human oversight — the four decisions that separate an agent pilot from an agent in production.
Ahmed Salih5 min read
Questions
For most business workloads, managed services are the better default. App Service and Azure Functions remove a large amount of operational work, and Container Apps covers the middle ground when you need container packaging without managing a cluster. Kubernetes earns its complexity when you have many services, specialised networking, or an existing platform team already running it. We choose based on the team who will operate the system, not on what is most interesting to build.
Managed identities wherever the service supports them, so there is no credential to rotate or leak. Where a secret is unavoidable, it lives in Key Vault and is referenced by configuration rather than copied into application settings, source control, or a deployment script. Access is granted by role to a specific identity rather than shared across a team.
Yes, and it is usually the more common starting point. We begin by documenting what exists — subscriptions, networking, identity, and deployment practice — then agree what stays, what gets brought under infrastructure as code, and what is genuinely worth changing. Wholesale re-platforming is rarely the right first move.
Cost is a design decision. Service tier, scaling rules, data egress, and storage lifecycle drive most of the bill, so we make those explicit during design rather than discovering them in the first invoice. After launch, tagging and budget alerts make it possible to attribute spend to a workload and catch a change in trajectory early.
Let's talk
Bring the problem rather than a specification. A short conversation is usually enough for us to tell you what we would do first — and whether we are the right people to do it.
Prefer email? info@aqlyst.ai