Skip to main content

Websites and portals built for performance, accessibility, and conversion

Corporate sites, customer and employee portals, ecommerce experiences, and design systems that load fast, meet accessibility standards, and turn visits into conversations.

What makes a business website perform in 2026?

Fast server-rendered pages, content structured so both search engines and AI assistants can extract it, accessibility built in from the first component rather than audited at the end, and a conversion path matched to how ready the visitor actually is. Design quality matters, but it is downstream of these four.

What this usually looks like from the inside

You're likely here because:

  • Pages are slow, and the analytics show people leaving before they render.
  • Accessibility came up late, as a legal risk rather than a design input.
  • The site looks good in a review and converts almost nobody.
  • Content is locked in a system nobody on the team is willing to use.
  • A portal exists, and staff still re-key what visitors submit through it.
  • Nobody measures what visitors actually do, so improvements are guesses.

Inside Digital Experiences

Each of these is a definition rather than a label — if a term below is not what you thought it meant, that is worth a conversation before a proposal.

Corporate websites
Marketing sites built as fast static pages with structured content, not as a page builder full of plugins.
Customer portals
Authenticated areas where a customer completes a task themselves instead of emailing someone who will.
Employee portals
Internal experiences that surface the handful of things people actually come for, rather than everything.
Ecommerce experiences
Transactional journeys designed around the checkout, the failure states, and the systems behind them.
Responsive web applications
Applications that work on the device people have with them, not just the one they were designed on.
Design systems
Reusable components with accessibility and contrast decided once, so a new page cannot regress either.
Accessibility and performance optimization
Existing sites measured against WCAG 2.2 AA and Core Web Vitals, then fixed in order of real user impact.
Conversion-focused information architecture
Navigation and page structure organized around what a visitor is trying to do, not around the org chart.

Verify, rank, decide, prove

The same four steps on every engagement. Nothing is scoped until the current state has been checked against the running system rather than taken from a report.

  1. Verify

    We check the running systems and the live data ourselves before agreeing what to build, because a status report or a closed ticket is a claim rather than a measurement. One to two weeks.

  2. Rank by reach

    We count how many users, records, and configurations each problem actually touches, and that count sets the order of work rather than how large the fix looks. We try to refute our own findings first, and tell you which ones did not survive.

  3. Decide in writing

    Before building starts you get a written scope that separates what you asked for, what we chose, what we are assuming but have not proven, and what we are deliberately leaving out. Nothing starts on an assumption nobody agreed to.

  4. Prove it moved

    Work arrives in slices, and each one carries a before-and-after measurement of the thing it was meant to change, because a passing test shows only that the test ran. Two to four weeks per slice, closing with a written record of what was verified.

Where we have done this

  • How a partner submission reaches the system of recordA partner signs in and submits directly against the system of record, removing a manual re-keying step. Status flows back to the submitter, so they no longer have to ask where their request stands.AUTHENTICATED SELF-SERVICEPartnersigned inSubmissionvalidatedSystemof recordStatus visible to the submitterNo re-keying, no chasing by email.

    Membership services

    Secure Partner Portal

    An authenticated self-service portal where partners submit and track requests directly against the system of record, removing a manual re-keying step from every submission.

    • Digital Experience
    • Cloud

Technology we use here

Product names are used descriptively. We select against the problem, not against a reseller agreement.

  • Next.js
  • TypeScript
  • Tailwind CSS
  • Power Pages
  • Dataverse
  • Azure Static Web Apps

How an engagement is packaged

Engagement model
Fixed-scope site or portal build
Typical duration
Six to twelve weeks depending on scope

Scope is set by the number of templates and integrations rather than the number of pages. Accessibility and performance targets are part of the definition of done.

Digital Experiences, answered

WCAG 2.2 Level AA, checked automatically in the build and manually for the things automation cannot see — keyboard order, focus visibility, and whether the reading sequence makes sense. Automated tools catch roughly a third of real accessibility defects, so a site that passes an automated scan and nothing else is not accessible, it is untested.

Largest Contentful Paint under 2.5 seconds on a mobile connection, interaction response under 200 milliseconds, and effectively no layout shift. Those are the thresholds Google treats as passing, and they correlate with what visitors tolerate. We treat them as a budget the build has to stay inside, not a score to chase afterwards.

Yes, and the honest answer is that it depends on which content. Marketing copy, articles, and case studies should be editable without a developer. Page structure and components generally should not be, because that is how a fast, accessible site slowly becomes neither. We agree that boundary with you during design rather than discovering it later.

Yes. We work from a design system rather than page-by-page mockups, which means the components, spacing, typography, and contrast decisions are made once and reused. If you already have brand guidelines or an existing design partner, we build to those — the system approach works the same either way.

Authentication goes through your existing identity provider rather than a new user database, so account lifecycle stays wherever it already is. Authorization is modeled explicitly and tested with representative users before release. The part that most often gets missed is what a portal user sees when something goes wrong, so we design those states rather than leaving them to the framework.

Next step

Tell us what needs to change.

Describe the problem rather than the solution. We will tell you what we would do first, how long it takes, and what it costs.

We reply to every message, usually within one business day.
info@aqlyst.ai · (901) 232-2944